by: Kelly A. Williams, a shareholder at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C.
Rapper Rick Ross and his producers sued LMFAO members Skyler and Stefan Gordy in December 2013, claiming that “Party Rock Anthem,” which topped the Billboard charts for six weeks and sold more than 7.5 million copies in the U.S., infringed Rick Ross’s 2006 hit “Hustlin’.” The court held that Rick Ross and his producers didn’t have the copyright registration necessary to sue for infringement. The court determined that Ross and his producers never presented evidence showing they were the owners of “Hustlin’,” and the three different registrations for the song at the U.S. Copyright Office were all inaccurate.
Interestingly, the members of LMFAO didn’t dispute that they had Ross’ “every day I’m hustlin” lyrics in mind when they drafted their “every day I’m shuffling” lyric. However, they raised several defenses including lack of standing and fair use. They won on lack of standing. If they had not, the court had previously ruled that it would leave the fair use issue for trial. That issue was whether LMFAO transformed Ross’ lyric into something new.
Also of note was the Register of Copyrights’ finding that the misrepresentations on three registrations for Ross’s Hustlin’ song were strong enough that the Register would cancel all three. The court also commented on this, finding that the misrepresentations were dramatic and unexplained especially because two of them were filed by major, global music corporations. The court’s ruling did not cancel the registrations. However, it did bar Ross from bringing the infringement action because it turned on whether there was a valid registration, and Ross and his producers didn’t have one.
The case is found at Roberts v. Gordy, case no. 1:13-cv-2470 in the U.S. Dist. Court for the S.D. Florida.
You must be logged in to post a comment.